RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) insertion of tube through ciliary sulcus (CS) versus anterior chamber (AC) placement in the North Indian population Methods: This retrospective comparative case series included 43 patients in CS group and 24 in AC group, who underwent GDD implantation, from March 2014 to February 2020. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti?glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results: Sixty?seven eyes of 66 patients were included in study with mean follow?up of 25.04 months (range, 12–69 months) in the CS group and 17.4 months (range, 13–28 months) in the AC group. Preoperatively the two groups were similar except for postpenetrating keratoplasty glaucoma (PPKG) and pseudophakic patients, which were higher in the CS group (P < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically insignificant difference in postoperative IOP and BCVA at last follow?up (P = 0.173, P = 0.495, respectively). Postoperative complications were similar, except for corneal decompensation which was significantly higher in the AC group (P = 0.042). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there was no statistically significant difference in mean IOP between the CS and AC groups at the last follow?up. CS placement of tube of GDD appears to be effective and safe technique. However, CS placement of tube resulted in lesser corneal decompensation and thus should be preferred in pseudophakic/aphakic patients, especially PPKG.
RESUMO
Purpose: To primarily compare surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), total and posterior corneal curvature, pachymetry, and their stabilization after 2.2 and 2.8 mm clear corneal incision in phacoemulsification. Methods: A randomized, prospective interventional study of 130 patients (130 eyes) of either sex having senile cataract (>40 years) divided randomly into two groups. The patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery with foldable intraocular lens implantation using 2.2 mm (group 1) and 2.8 mm incisions (group 2). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and followed?up at first, third, and sixth weeks. Results: Mean SIA was less in group 1 at all the follow?up visits which was not statistically significant (P value – 0.507 (at week 1), 0.626 (at week 3), and 0.312 (at week 6). Mean SIA decreased from week 1 to week 6 in both the groups. Both the groups showed an increase in SIA with the increase in the hardness of cataract. Posterior keratometry (k1 and k2) showed statistically significant steepening in the first postoperative week, followed by gradual flattening which continued till the sixth week postoperatively. Posterior astigmatism increased in both the groups at week 1 (not statistically significant). Thereafter, it decreases and does not change significantly after 3 weeks. Pachymetry increased significantly (P value < 0.001 in both the groups) in the first week in both the groups and thereafter stabilizing at 3 weeks. Conclusion: Reducing the incision size does not result in any significant reduction in SIA. We observed that the posterior corneal curvature majorly stabilized by 3 weeks, but some stabilization continued till 6 weeks.